"The 'aura' of
tangible art provides much of its value, a value lessened in the age of
mechanical reproduction"
Is Walter Benjamin onto something? Is there some part of us that can never be captured by modern technology? A part of us that should refuse?
I found the awesome collage,
“Park iLife” (featured at the top of my blog), on a website/art blog, Hang-Up, that featured the artist, Joe
Webb. They wrote a small article about his work called “The Power of Collage”. In it, he says:
“I started making collages as a sort of luddite reaction to
working on computer for years. I like the limitations of it... using found
imagery and a pair of scissors, there's no Googling for material or Photoshop
to resize, adjust or undo. There is an element of serendipity in finding images
that work together that can't be replicated in the digital world.”
Ironic, isn’t it? That I found his art
online, and that now his art is featured on my blog? In my own life, I do a lot of my expression on and
off the web. As a poet, I almost always start by putting pen to paper, and then
eventually translate a piece to the computer to edit or share. I also journal,
draw, and collage-- all in my sturdy journal (that goes more places with me
than my laptop does). But even though I create in a non-digital way, I often
share my creations digitally, be it a photo on Instagram, or a scanned image on
Tumblr.
It is interesting though, how the act
of creating hard-copy art and reproducing it on the computer is sort of
analogous to the art of creating identity and translating it through digital
media. Or is it more complex than that? Does identity also get formed through using technology?
Reflecting on my childhood (growing up with the internet), has
made realize that I strongly identify with having "multiple selves".
And this goes beyond having a divide between my "in real life (IRL) self" and my "virtual
self". I feel as if I take on a different persona through each different
electronic platform I engage with. Are these personas devoid of my IRL “aura”?
When I dig into my digital past (similar to supernovagirl95's awesome post
"Post
Google Anxiety"), I find embarrassing YouTube videos I made in middle
school, including awkward music videos and this ridiculous gem: "I EAT MY FRIENDS" (we were bored, ok?).
I also find the creative "Bracelet Girls" videos my friends and I
made, where we went around downtown Santa Cruz giving away free bracelets
and interviewed
strangers about their New Year's Resolutions in the process.
I suppose it only makes sense now that currently I am studying
Rhetoric & Media and have a Vimeo
Account that serves for both creative personal projects and academic
ones, like "Green", a
stop motion film I made last semester about environmental consumerism. And in addition
to this media blog, I update a personal academic website, "Metanoia" with a lot of material
from my other classes.
My point in sharing this collection of digital Ajna with you, is to reflect the many different aspects of myself that I channel and develop over the web. I currently also participate in social media. As I previously
mentioned, I use Facebook & Instagram. Unlike my crazy kid YouTube days, now when I use online platforms, I
always feel very hyper aware that I am communicating through a mass medium. My posts
tend to include some photography, small updates on life events, and cool/important stuff
I find on the Internet. But I definitely filter myself knowing that family, peers, old friends, new friends friends of friends, etc. will be watching. My persona face-to-face or on more private platforms (like Snapchat or texting) is much more silly, emotional, daring, and unfiltered—because I’m
usually communicating only with people I am very close with and I am not
worrying about my "image".
Clearly, as a teen, spending
time making YouTube videos contributed to my ability to make academic ones
later down the road. In the digital world, there are spaces for academic Ajna. Spaces for comedic
Ajna. Spaces for college-student-having-fun-but-not-too-much-fun Ajna. Reflecting on all these
platforms makes me feel a bit anxious over what or which identity is the
"real" me.
Ah, and just as I start to approach the sounds of an existential crisis, I am calmed by recalling Nancy Baym's words: "Authentic self representation is not always a simple question of true and false" (34). Yes. Yes, indeed, there doesn't have to be a "real" me versus a fragmented-digital-array of questionable personas. Can an Aura be Liked, Tweeted, or Reblogged? The human spirit is dynamic, and very well may be inhabiting more than just bodies these days. My life is a multi-media collage.
Ah, and just as I start to approach the sounds of an existential crisis, I am calmed by recalling Nancy Baym's words: "Authentic self representation is not always a simple question of true and false" (34). Yes. Yes, indeed, there doesn't have to be a "real" me versus a fragmented-digital-array of questionable personas. Can an Aura be Liked, Tweeted, or Reblogged? The human spirit is dynamic, and very well may be inhabiting more than just bodies these days. My life is a multi-media collage.
Ajna, you raise a lot of really good points in this post! I think that most of us kids who grew up online and now are adults will go through some sort of identity crisis surrounding the web (not saying that you are going through one... haha)
ReplyDeleteI do think that one of the subtle points that you brought up is really important though that your younger youtube days help you now as a student know how to navigate the platform and create videos. I know with all these identities it's hard to figure out which one is real or authentic. But I think that they all are. Just as you have different relationships with different people (I don't know about you but I am usually super silly with my friends but am able to be serious during a job interview or when I am in class) you can have different presences online. Having different degrees and different level of yourself is an organic process, one that I think is also mirrored online. Great post!